Programming Languages

  This article makes the effort to explain the advance to science that was Lisp in the age that John McCarty wrote it and the main concepts about it, its simplicity but also the smartness of it, considering that in this day and age most programming languages that were based in the formula of c are taking lots of inspiration from Lisps and implementing its functions into their own core it is really worth it to know how the Lisps are made from the inside out. It comments that everything is either an atom or a list of expressions and an expression yields a return value, it salso talks about the quote that is a way for telling that we do not want  the next list to be evaluated as an expression, because by default every list is an expression the first parameter is going to be considered as a function applied the the next parameters, and if the first parameter is a number or a symbol it will not know what to do with it. And the most important thing is how we can write functions that can act

  The first thing that impressed me about is the age of Lisp, even today functional programming is considered black magic by a lot of people, is quite a different paradigm to what we are accustomed to and it being so old but still being a novelty is quite amusing, second thing is that he talked about making functions in runtime, that in a lot of situations would be awesome for some applications since clojure comes from lisp a expect it to have it too maybe even a better more refined version of it, I see how combining the compactness of the language and its ability to kinda write itself could be an enormous advantage thinking about programmer time and if you can do the same with less lines of code it will probably be cheaper to produce, maybe I’m wrong because at the end of the day you still have to think the logic of the program and it eats some of those savings. Thinking about artificial intelligence and science guys as its core audience is quite advanced to this era, I think Lisp eas

  Those histories are quite interesting and actually funny in a way in those times of the first general purpose computers no one had actual qualifications, a career or higher studies about computers programming so they were hiring basically anyone with any kind of experience that would relate to the topic or that the interview would consider relates, because of that a lot of women were hired to be programmers since they had some experience with military systems from WWII. It is quite funny that an oppression in WWII for given women “jobs for women” is what gave them the power to stand for themselves in the workforce of that era in a field that is still considered the future of the world 70 year after. Wilkes said that working in computer science was a lonely task, I guess since they had to test a lot of untested things by themselves and they do not shared a lot of times with the team,  but she also said that everyone in her team accepted hear and that they were a bunch of geeks so I do